WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM: The Public Eye Is Watching

Friday, January 25, 2008

By Gustavo Capdevila - BERN, Jan 17 (IPS) - Civil society is in Davos, Switzerland once again to keep a watchful eye on events at the World Economic Forum (WEF). The social and environmental behaviour of 1,000 of the world’s most powerful companies will be scutinised at this annual meeting of business leaders, presidents and prime ministers, and free-market economics experts.

Pro Natura, the Swiss branch of Friends of the Earth, and The Berne Declaration, a non-governmental organisation (NGO), will be awarding their sarcastic prizes known as the Public Eye awards to transnational corporations judged to have shown the greatest public irresponsibility in a ceremony on Jan. 23.

The "winner", to be announced at a ceremony in the Alpine tourist resort of Davos in southeast Switzerland, will be one of three companies that have emerged as favourites: the French state nuclear company Areva, transnational German chemical company Bayer CropScience, and the Philippine subsidiary of U.S. fruit company Dole Foods.

The candidates for the disgraceful distinction are members of the WEF, which will be holding its traditional annual meetings from Jan. 23 to 27.

Over the course of these meetings -- which are sometimes joined by internationally renowned personalities from the arts and entertainment world -- the WEF "courts world leaders and lobbies for generalised freedom in trade and finance," Sonja Ribi of Pro Natura told IPS.

Public Eye takes it upon itself to shine a light on "the dark side of globalisation," for the benefit of public opinion. Public Eye demands that transnational corporations "at least show a minimum commitment to society and the environment," said Oliver Classen, of The Berne Declaration.

The campaign demonstrates to the actors in the global economy that destructive social and environmental effects of their business practices "not only harm the direct victims of this damage, but also affect the reputations of their companies," Classen told IPS.

Whether they are patenting vital medicines, unscrupulously exploiting natural resources or trampling on workers’ rights, there is no limit to the insatiable greed of the CEOs gathered in Davos, the Berne Declaration activist said.

Under the pretext of "improving the state of the world," the leaders of major companies use this annual opportunity to establish contacts and exert their influence over other members of the business community and government representatives, Ribi said.

But the Public Eye turns the occasion to advantage in condemning the hugely negative consequences of their obsession with profit margins, she said.

In parallel, the NGOs also demand humane labour conditions, company responsibility for their final products, and environmentally sustainable practices.

The three firms nominated for the prize have been singled out for poor social and environmental behaviour. For example, Areva’s track record was examined in Niger, where its subsidiary companies Somair and Cominak mine uranium.

Mineworkers are given inadequate information about the health risks of open-air storage of radioactive materials, said Pro Natura and The Berne Declaration.

Furthermore, the mining company hospitals issue deliberately false diagnoses for sick workers, and sign death certificates blaming AIDS when workers die of cancer. These practices ensure that the employers evade paying for their miners’ medical treatment, the NGOs said.

Areva has mined uranium in Niger -- a former French colony -- for 40 years. Radioactivity levels in air, water and soil in the mining areas are above internationally accepted safety levels, the Public Eye NGOs said.

Bayer CropScience -- said to be the world market leader in insecticides -- has been nominated for the award for its attempts to impose jatropha cultivation in India. Jatropha nut kernels have an oil content of 40 percent, and so the plant is a good candidate for biodiesel production.

However, the two NGOs said that plans to expand jatropha farming in India include using land currently used to grow food. Peasant farmers working small plots of land would become dependent on the use of expensive agrochemicals which are essential for jatropha cultivation if they switch to the new biofuel crop, they said.

Another problem is that jatropha leaves and nuts are toxic. Well-known Indian activist Vandana Shiva published a study on the effects of jatropha cultivation in her country in November, and started a mass campaign to discourage its expansion.

Pro Natura and The Berne Declaration say that in order to expand jatropha cultivation, Bayer is using its contacts to lobby for support at the Secretariat of the U.N. Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), and at the U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP).

A Public Eye document says: "In order to prevent greenwashing, the NGOs [Pro Natura and The Berne Declaration] call on the United Nations to establish criteria defining with whom they cooperate and under what conditions."

The third nominee is Dole Philippines Inc. -- a subsidiary of the U.S. Dole Food Company -- which has pineapple plantations on 12,000 hectares of the most fertile land in the Philippines, as well as a canning and packaging plant.

Since 1990 the company has downsized from 8,000 to 5,000 permanent employees, while the number of temporary workers, a large proportion of whom are women, has risen from zero to 12,000.

Their wages are four dollars a day -- half of what the Philippine government defines as the poverty line. In contrast, at Dole’s Hawaiian plantations, workers are paid five dollars an hour.

Many small farmers have rented their land to Dole, which now employs them as plantation workers. The peasant farmers can only fulfil the work demanded of them with the help of their children, who drop out of school and suffer health problems from overwork and from toxic chemicals -- like Endosulfan -- used on the plantations.

The two NGOs also reported that Dole has been exerting pressure on the Philippine workers’ unions.

Classen said that multinational companies, like the 1,000 members of the World Economic Forum, must take their corporate social and environmental responsibilities more seriously. Otherwise he warned, they will not only lose credibility, but their investors, employees and customers as well.


The public eye is on Davos

January 23, 2008 - 8:30 PM Business and government leaders at the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos should be under no illusion – the rest of the planet is watching.

The message from non-governmental organisations Berne Declaration and Pro Natura (Friends of the Earth Switzerland) to the elite is clear – equitable globalisation requires more corporate responsibility.

The two NGOs have made the southeastern Swiss resort a venue to air their concerns about what they consider irresponsible corporations, which receive anti-awards (Public Eye) for "particularly nasty corporate behaviour".

"These awards are designed to put pressure on multi-national companies which misbehave for the most part in the southern part of the world, ecologically and socially," Oliver Classen, spokesman of the Berne Declaration told swissinfo.

"We name and shame them here in Davos right next to the Congress Centre where those responsible meet over the next days. It's exactly the place to get our message across.

"Our message is: Global players watch out. We're watching you. We are a threat to their reputations. They know that, and they should behave accordingly."
Serious story

Classen says that the annual awards are not a minor event but a serious story the NGOs are telling. "It will be heard better soon in the Congress Centre."

For the record, the French nuclear concern Areva received the Public Eye Global Award and Swiss-based natural resources group Glencore, based in the tax haven of canton Zug, was the winner of the Public Eye Swiss Award.

Speaking at the award ceremony prior to the opening of the WEF meeting, political scientist and author on poverty underdevelopment and debt, Susan George, did not mince her words about the economic summit.

"The meeting on the money mountain is useless in the sense that the people are there just to legitimise their own system.

"They have certainly not found any solutions to the [ecological and financial] crises they have created... I would say you have got to stop doing it all for yourselves and nothing for other people and if you won't, which seems to be the case, then we must get you under public control, to which they won't submit easily."
Long battle

George, American-born but a French passport carrier, said it would be a long political battle.

"They are fighting every step of the way to say that they can self-regulate and are perfectly capable of running the financial system, saving the world and its environment. We see the results. Politically we have to get them under control.

"We have to make sure they don't create further crises, which always hit the poorest and the most vulnerable."

George said she thought the WEF meeting in Davos was the "biggest party that was ever conceived."

"They're all there to congratulate each other. That's the main point."

swissinfo, Robert Brookes in Davos

Posted in |