<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Nuclear power in Europe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.climatesceptics.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org</link>
	<description>nuclear power related activities in Europe</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Reasonable Doubt by Alexandra Prokopenko</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org/health/reasonable-doubt/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra Prokopenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:51:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesceptics.org/health/reasonable-doubt/#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>Check out this link to another similar report in France that we posted recently.
http://atomwatch.blogspot.com/2008/04/french-review-examines-nuclear-site.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this link to another similar report in France that we posted recently.<br />
<a href="http://atomwatch.blogspot.com/2008/04/french-review-examines-nuclear-site.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://atomwatch.blogspot.com/2008/04/french-review-examines-nuclear-site.html');" rel="nofollow">http://atomwatch.blogspot.com/2008/04/french-review-examines-nuclear-site.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thorp restarts nuclear reprocessing by Lofoten against Sellafield</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org/country/united-kingdom/sellafield/thorp-restarts-nuclear-reprocessing/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>Lofoten against Sellafield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 06:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesceptics.org/company/bng/thorp-restarts-nuclear-reprocessing/#comment-786</guid>
		<description>We have been working for a long time to stop the discharges from Sellafield that comes to our coastline here up in the north.  We hope that the restart of Thorp will not give us any risk for new discharges either by air or into our common sea. But the safety culture so far at Sellafield has given us signal that this will happen again and again......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been working for a long time to stop the discharges from Sellafield that comes to our coastline here up in the north.  We hope that the restart of Thorp will not give us any risk for new discharges either by air or into our common sea. But the safety culture so far at Sellafield has given us signal that this will happen again and again&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Albania in nuclear export scheme by Lookas Koohtin</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org/country/other_coutries/greece/albania-in-nuclear-export-scheme/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Lookas Koohtin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daniel.wikimaas.org/nukes/greece/albania-in-nuclear-export-scheme/#comment-358</guid>
		<description>Philosophy and History are useless after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philosophy and History are useless after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Watchdog examines nuclear alert at Torness by daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org/country/united-kingdom/torness/watchdog-examines-nuclear-alert-at-torness/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesceptics.org/company/british-energy/watchdog-examines-nuclear-alert-at-torness/#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Nice, Christmas eve. What an appropriate night for the lights to go off. I bet you there was something wrong, otherwise they would've don it an other day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, Christmas eve. What an appropriate night for the lights to go off. I bet you there was something wrong, otherwise they would&#8217;ve don it an other day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Nuclear&#8217; TV hackers face trial by Jeremy Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org/country/czech-republic/nuclear-tv-hackers-face-trial/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Cassidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesceptics.org/country/czech-republic/nuclear-tv-hackers-face-trial/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Wow, what a great subvert. Very simple very elegant.

The best thing to happen is for the 'authorities' to make a big thing of it and try to prosecute them.

It's similar to the climate camp next to Heathrow in Britain last Summer. The Blessed Airport Authority (BAA) put an exclusion order on the site and thereby prevented a sizable percentage of the British population from even taking public transport to the airport.
They lost their case and enabled the protest camp to gain much greater publicity than they could have hoped for.

So let the madness reveal itself for what it is!!

And remember, it's a funny old world.   @;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a great subvert. Very simple very elegant.</p>
<p>The best thing to happen is for the &#8216;authorities&#8217; to make a big thing of it and try to prosecute them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s similar to the climate camp next to Heathrow in Britain last Summer. The Blessed Airport Authority (BAA) put an exclusion order on the site and thereby prevented a sizable percentage of the British population from even taking public transport to the airport.<br />
They lost their case and enabled the protest camp to gain much greater publicity than they could have hoped for.</p>
<p>So let the madness reveal itself for what it is!!</p>
<p>And remember, it&#8217;s a funny old world.   @;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Nuclear&#8217; TV hackers face trial by prof.dr Ludwik Tomialojc</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org/country/czech-republic/nuclear-tv-hackers-face-trial/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>prof.dr Ludwik Tomialojc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesceptics.org/country/czech-republic/nuclear-tv-hackers-face-trial/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>I am a bit confused because of a form of protest by Czech activists. But, I am sharing the feelings of a hopelessness of all those people of the Earth who want safe future for their children and grandchildren!
   A threat of putting Czech activists to jail reflects hipocrisy and increasing ARROGANCY of the ruling groups, observed in many countries.
   True threat to humanity do not bring protesting citizens, but the nuclear and military lobby forcing the unsafe nuclear enterprises like Temelin or antiballistic rockets with the help of brain-washing propaganda and autocratic decisions! 
    Ironically, instead of being on our side, many of the clergymen are (silently or even loudly, and not only in Iran, Russia or USA) backing up dangerous nuclear projects. As if speeding up the Armageddon?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a bit confused because of a form of protest by Czech activists. But, I am sharing the feelings of a hopelessness of all those people of the Earth who want safe future for their children and grandchildren!<br />
   A threat of putting Czech activists to jail reflects hipocrisy and increasing ARROGANCY of the ruling groups, observed in many countries.<br />
   True threat to humanity do not bring protesting citizens, but the nuclear and military lobby forcing the unsafe nuclear enterprises like Temelin or antiballistic rockets with the help of brain-washing propaganda and autocratic decisions!<br />
    Ironically, instead of being on our side, many of the clergymen are (silently or even loudly, and not only in Iran, Russia or USA) backing up dangerous nuclear projects. As if speeding up the Armageddon?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Nuclear&#8217; TV hackers face trial by Johan</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org/country/czech-republic/nuclear-tv-hackers-face-trial/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Johan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesceptics.org/country/czech-republic/nuclear-tv-hackers-face-trial/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Interesting that one possibly could put people in jail because they frighten someone (the scary movie bizniz would vanish pretty soon or go underground).

but here is a thought: why not prosecute the pro-nuclear lobby with same arguments. they are indeed scary!

i am not familiar with czech law but what could they actually be charged with?
intrusion in to public service facilities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that one possibly could put people in jail because they frighten someone (the scary movie bizniz would vanish pretty soon or go underground).</p>
<p>but here is a thought: why not prosecute the pro-nuclear lobby with same arguments. they are indeed scary!</p>
<p>i am not familiar with czech law but what could they actually be charged with?<br />
intrusion in to public service facilities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nuclear climate sceptics - how nuclear fossils never believed in climate change, and probably never will by Andy Kadir-Buxton</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org/nuclear-climate-sceptics/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Kadir-Buxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesceptics.org/nuclear_climate_sceptics/#comment-55</guid>
		<description>A Plan to Make All Countries Near-Zero Carbon Emitters Within Ten Years   

I have been campaigning for a government driven campaign to make the UK a Near-Zero Carbon Country since shortly after I invented the Buxton Geothermal Turbine Generator in the 1980s. Twenty years down the line the UK has done nothing, and I get the run around from various government departments. I am sure that these same people will give me the run around for another ten years, when it will be too late to stop global warming. It is difficult to get hold of all the figures necessary to show that countries can become near-zero carbon countries. However, there is a simple explanation that adequately reveals how this necessary target can be achieved. All our power requirements are for lighting, heating, transport, and energy for such things as industry on down to exercise machines. To make things simple we can assume that each category is 25% of total power. The lighting can be zero rated by building Buxton Geothermal Turbine Generators, the heating can be near-zero rated by installing Starlite coatings, that prevents heat escaping, on the walls and ceilings of all premises, and by having electrical heating from renewable sources we cut heating CO2 emissions to zero. Transport can be made near-zero in terms of carbon emissions by ensuring that all vehicles use carbon zero electricity, instead of petrol. This may seem to be an anathema to ‘‘petrol heads’’ but this displeasure can be simply overcome. At the moment when inventors come up with new technologies for electrical vehicles Oil Companies buy and destroy the patents and designs. These patents have a shelf life of ten years so we could soon put together a group of past inventors in this field to reproduce their work legally, as an intergovernmental team. We still have the problem of transport by aeroplane and ship having to use fossil fuels. However, their carbon footprints can be at least halved by having their fuels mixed with water using an ultrasonic dibber. Finally, the power needed for energy can be made entirely of carbon free electricity. New ways of making industry work using electricity instead of the gas that they are used to will be needed, but these are not insurmountable problems given that the Governments of the world have ten years to achieve the target. 

All Government Departments must be part of the solution to the greatest threat to life on earth. They must work together, there is no point in hoping that the ‘invisible hand’ of the market has the ability to pay for such a massive clean up. In comparison, the threat of terrorism is a minor side show, and we would not leave the market to this task. The £60 billion being spent on replacing Trident submarines would have solved CO2 emission problems in the UK. This does not mean to say that this was our last chance, just a step in the wrong direction. Funding can be found from elsewhere. ‘The Ecologist’ magazine estimates the true cost of mental illness to the UK is £100 billion per year. When all patients suffering from mental illness are passed on to their trained local practice nurse for a thirty second cure using the Kadir-Buxton Method then we have immediate and massive savings.(The alternative of expensive drugs which, in trials, have less success than no treatment at all, should be made a thing of the past). The money saved by the UK would clean up CO2 emissions in the UK using the above plan. It is also easy to adapt it to any other country. 


Please sign my petition to cut CO2 Emissions by 30% at: http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/CO2Reduction/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Plan to Make All Countries Near-Zero Carbon Emitters Within Ten Years   </p>
<p>I have been campaigning for a government driven campaign to make the UK a Near-Zero Carbon Country since shortly after I invented the Buxton Geothermal Turbine Generator in the 1980s. Twenty years down the line the UK has done nothing, and I get the run around from various government departments. I am sure that these same people will give me the run around for another ten years, when it will be too late to stop global warming. It is difficult to get hold of all the figures necessary to show that countries can become near-zero carbon countries. However, there is a simple explanation that adequately reveals how this necessary target can be achieved. All our power requirements are for lighting, heating, transport, and energy for such things as industry on down to exercise machines. To make things simple we can assume that each category is 25% of total power. The lighting can be zero rated by building Buxton Geothermal Turbine Generators, the heating can be near-zero rated by installing Starlite coatings, that prevents heat escaping, on the walls and ceilings of all premises, and by having electrical heating from renewable sources we cut heating CO2 emissions to zero. Transport can be made near-zero in terms of carbon emissions by ensuring that all vehicles use carbon zero electricity, instead of petrol. This may seem to be an anathema to ‘‘petrol heads’’ but this displeasure can be simply overcome. At the moment when inventors come up with new technologies for electrical vehicles Oil Companies buy and destroy the patents and designs. These patents have a shelf life of ten years so we could soon put together a group of past inventors in this field to reproduce their work legally, as an intergovernmental team. We still have the problem of transport by aeroplane and ship having to use fossil fuels. However, their carbon footprints can be at least halved by having their fuels mixed with water using an ultrasonic dibber. Finally, the power needed for energy can be made entirely of carbon free electricity. New ways of making industry work using electricity instead of the gas that they are used to will be needed, but these are not insurmountable problems given that the Governments of the world have ten years to achieve the target. </p>
<p>All Government Departments must be part of the solution to the greatest threat to life on earth. They must work together, there is no point in hoping that the ‘invisible hand’ of the market has the ability to pay for such a massive clean up. In comparison, the threat of terrorism is a minor side show, and we would not leave the market to this task. The £60 billion being spent on replacing Trident submarines would have solved CO2 emission problems in the UK. This does not mean to say that this was our last chance, just a step in the wrong direction. Funding can be found from elsewhere. ‘The Ecologist’ magazine estimates the true cost of mental illness to the UK is £100 billion per year. When all patients suffering from mental illness are passed on to their trained local practice nurse for a thirty second cure using the Kadir-Buxton Method then we have immediate and massive savings.(The alternative of expensive drugs which, in trials, have less success than no treatment at all, should be made a thing of the past). The money saved by the UK would clean up CO2 emissions in the UK using the above plan. It is also easy to adapt it to any other country. </p>
<p>Please sign my petition to cut CO2 Emissions by 30% at: <a href="http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/CO2Reduction/" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/CO2Reduction/');" rel="nofollow">http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/CO2Reduction/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nuclear climate sceptics - how nuclear fossils never believed in climate change, and probably never will by Robert Palgrave</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org/nuclear-climate-sceptics/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Palgrave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 19:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesceptics.org/nuclear_climate_sceptics/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Alexandra,

you suggest: "So far nothing better is invented". I disagree. Take a look at the fast growing proven technology of concentrating solar power (CSP), also being described as Solar Thermal. Utility scale electricity generation from a totally clean source which will only run out when the sun dies. Several millions of years after humankind dies out!

See this site for latest news: http://www.trec-uk.org.uk/index.htm

Einstein said: "Any fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction."

Apart from stored geothermal heat, the Earth gets all its energy from the Sun, and this will be the case for ever - so let's start using it intelligently and not waste time with short-term chemistry experiments like nuclear power and biofuels. 

The best place for a nuclear reactor is 93 million miles away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alexandra,</p>
<p>you suggest: &#8220;So far nothing better is invented&#8221;. I disagree. Take a look at the fast growing proven technology of concentrating solar power (CSP), also being described as Solar Thermal. Utility scale electricity generation from a totally clean source which will only run out when the sun dies. Several millions of years after humankind dies out!</p>
<p>See this site for latest news: <a href="http://www.trec-uk.org.uk/index.htm" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://www.trec-uk.org.uk/index.htm');" rel="nofollow">http://www.trec-uk.org.uk/index.htm</a></p>
<p>Einstein said: &#8220;Any fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction.&#8221;</p>
<p>Apart from stored geothermal heat, the Earth gets all its energy from the Sun, and this will be the case for ever - so let&#8217;s start using it intelligently and not waste time with short-term chemistry experiments like nuclear power and biofuels. </p>
<p>The best place for a nuclear reactor is 93 million miles away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nuclear climate sceptics - how nuclear fossils never believed in climate change, and probably never will by Alexandra Prokopenko</title>
		<link>http://www.climatesceptics.org/nuclear-climate-sceptics/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandra Prokopenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 11:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesceptics.org/nuclear_climate_sceptics/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Well, I had a chance to speak to some proponents recently (Russian nuclear experts forum www.atominfo.ru) - even asking them a few tricky question, for instance, regarding the concequences of nuclear waste accumulating without any permanent facilities to sore them, also regarding uranium enrichment technologies which emit greenhouse gases as well, - and the answer was: YES there are risks but so far nuclear power is the most cost-efficient and environment friendly technology existing in commercial operation that can meet the growing energy needs. So far nothing better is invented. Therefore, nuclear renessaince is about to become a reality in nearest future.
That reminds what Churchill said about democracy - its bad but so far the humanity did not invent any better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I had a chance to speak to some proponents recently (Russian nuclear experts forum <a href="http://www.atominfo.ru" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://www.atominfo.ru');" rel="nofollow">http://www.atominfo.ru</a>) - even asking them a few tricky question, for instance, regarding the concequences of nuclear waste accumulating without any permanent facilities to sore them, also regarding uranium enrichment technologies which emit greenhouse gases as well, - and the answer was: YES there are risks but so far nuclear power is the most cost-efficient and environment friendly technology existing in commercial operation that can meet the growing energy needs. So far nothing better is invented. Therefore, nuclear renessaince is about to become a reality in nearest future.<br />
That reminds what Churchill said about democracy - its bad but so far the humanity did not invent any better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
